Admittedly, I’d rather not be shot with either, but if I had to choose, I’d take a round from the AK-47 over the M4 any day of the week. To add a caveat to that statement, I’m talking from relatively close range here — say up to 150 to 200 meters.
To understand why, it’s important to first take a very basic look at the physics behind terminal ballistics.
In this case, consider the science of what happens when a penetrating missile enters a human body.
The first place to start is the following kinetic-energy equation:
Breaking this equation down into its components, we have kinetic energy (KE) influenced by the mass (M) of the penetrating missile, as well as the velocity (V) of the missile.
This makes sense; it is logical that a heavier, faster missile will do more damage than a lighter, slower missile. What is important to understand is the relative influence that mass and velocity have on kinetic energy, as this is key to understanding why I’d rather be shot with an AK than with an M4.
You’ll notice that the mass component of the KE equation is halved, whereas the velocity component is squared. For this reason, the velocity of the projectile has far more bearing on the energy that it delivers into the target than the mass.
The V1-V2 component of the equation takes into consideration that the projectile might actually pass straight through the target, rather than coming to rest in the target.
In this instance, the change in the velocity of the projectile as it passes through the target (V1 being its velocity as it enters, and V2 being velocity on exit) is the factor that is considered when calculating how much energy the missile delivered into the target.
Naturally, if the projectile comes to rest in the target (i.e., no exit wound), then V2 equals zero and the projectile’s velocity as it entered (V1) is used to calculate the KE.
That’s enough physics for now, but you get the concept that the optimum projectile to shoot someone with is one that has a decent mass; is very, very fast; and is guaranteed to come to restin your target so as to dissipate as much energy as possible into it, and hence do maximal damage.
The next concept to grasp is that of permanent cavitation versus temporary cavitation. Permanent cavitation is the hole left in a target from a projectile punching through it. You can think of it simply like a sharp stick being pushed through a target and leaving a hole the diameter of the stick.
The permanent cavity left by a bullet is proportionate to the surface area of the bullet as it passes through the tissue.
For instance, if an AK-47 round with a 7.62mm diameter at its widest point passes cleanly through a target, it will leave a round, 7.62mm permanent cavity.
If this hole goes through a vital structure in the body, the wound can be fatal.
If the bullet passes through soft tissues only, however, the permanent cavity can be relatively benign.
Below is a slow-motion video by Brass Fetcher of a 5.56x45mm round (same as what the M4 fires) hitting ballistic gelatin in slow motion.
After watching, the medical provider can begin to appreciate the damage done to tissues by the pressure wave of the temporary cavitation.
Having had the chance to treat dozens of high-velocity missile wounds over my years in the military, I’ve seen firsthand the effect that various rifle calibers can have at various distances, hitting various body parts. Naturally a multitude of variables come into play when someone gets shot, and no two gunshot wounds are ever going to be the same.
The purpose of this article is not to draw any academic conclusions about the ballistics of the AK-47 versus the M4, or argue the merits of one ammo over another; it is to introduce the concepts of the different wounding profiles of permanent and temporary cavities using a couple of case studies.
Below are two examples I was involved with that illustrate somewhat of a comparative study of an AK-47 round and an M4 round striking approximately the same anatomical location from roughly the same range (in these cases, 150 to 200 meters).
This series of photos you can see a particularly nasty M4 gunshot wound, with a small entrance wound in the right lower buttock, and a massive exit wound in the right lateral thigh.
The X-ray in the last image shows that the projectile struck the upper femur and demolished the bone, sending secondary bone fragments flying through the tissues and accounting for the majority of the exit wound.
The damage done by the pressure wave of the temporary cavity can be appreciated in the first image, with deep bruising extending up the buttock and into the casualty’s lower back. This bruising resulted from the energy dissipated through the tissues pulverizing small blood vessels in its path (think back to the ballistic gelatin video to imagine what went on in the tissues).
The granular material in the middle of the thigh wound seen on the X-ray is an older-generation QuikClot advanced clotting sponge (ACS), which was inserted at the point of injury for hemorrhage control to excellent effect. The bright white fragments on the X-ray are small pieces of the bullet, which had disintegrated on impact with the tissue and bone. This is another characteristic of the M4 round that makes it all the more unappealing to be shot with — the tendency for the bullet to disintegrate if it strikes tissue at a decent velocity.
Despite being a jacketed round, because it’s smaller, lighter, and faster than an AK-47 projectile, the 5.56mm tends to yaw faster once it hits tissue. The shearing forces on the bullet once it is traveling at 90 degrees through the tissue often tears the bullet into pieces, thus creating multiple smaller projectiles and increasing the chances of all of the bullet parts remaining in the target, and hence dissipating more energy.
Here’s a video from The Ammo Channel of the AK-47’s 7.62x39mm projectile being fired into ballistic gelatin for comparison to the video above of the 5.56x45mm (M4) round. Though the video shows a soft-point round being used, which theoretically should be more destructive than its full-metal-jacket counterpart, the video still illustrates nicely the significant penetration of the AK-47 round without it yawing significantly or disintegrating.
I once saw a good case study illustrating this point, where a casualty had sustained an AK-47 gunshot wound to the right lateral thigh and we recovered the intact bullet from the inside of his left upper abdominal wall. It had passed through approximately one metre of his tissues and shredded his small bowel, but the projectile hadn’t fragmented at all, and the temporary cavitation hadn’t done enough damage to be lethal. The casualty required a laparotomy to remove multiple sections of small intestine, but he made a good recovery. That one is a story for another time.
The following photo is of a good friend of mine who was shot by an AK-47 from approximately 200 meters while standing right next to me!
Fortunately the bullet passed cleanly through, and after a surgical clean-out the afternoon of the injury, he turned up ready for work the very next day. They breed them tough where he is from!
The entrance wound is at the top of the left buttock, with the exit being down on the left upper thigh. Though the injury is unpleasant to have, the fact that the AK-47 round was traveling slower than an M4’s round at the same range, coupled with the fact that the projectile remained intact and didn’t yaw significantly as it passed through him, meant the wound was nowhere near as devastating as the above-mentioned M4 injury in the same area.
It must be noted, however, that the comparison is far from perfect, given that the M4 injury involved the bone, with the one immediately above passing solely through soft tissues.
So there it is. All things being equal, when all is said and done, I’d rather be shot with an AK-47 than an M4 on any day of the week. Naturally, as medical responders, it is always important to treat the wound and not the rifle that inflicted it, and I have certainly seen some horrendous AK-47 wounds over the years and some relatively minor ones from M4s. It all depends.
The main take-home points for first responders and medicos are: Be aware of the magnitude of damage that can be caused by the temporary cavitation resulting from high-velocity missile wounds, and if you find an entrance wound, there’s no telling where in the body the projectile might have ended up!
The moral of the story is look at the bruising and swelling of the wounds. There is no way our Orlando ‘survivors’ were shot. The 7.62 mm round is even the one that does less damage. The wounds of the .223 are egregious. It’s going to take a lot to restore a victim to health. The alleged victims bear no evidence of having been shot. Keep this in mind as further fake shootings are thrust upon us.
On Thursday, actor-producer James Woods warned on Twitter that civil war could break out if Democrats succeed in removing Donald Trump, essentially overturning the 2016 election in a coup d’etat.
Many agreed with his assessment of the situation.
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) August 4, 2017
Armed and ready…
— PersonalProtectionUS (@PersProtectnUSA) August 4, 2017
Agreed. Democrats are the minority & have incorrectly assumed that The Right will roll over under pressure. They've confused us with Rinos.
— Trump Is President (@DHQuinones) August 4, 2017
If that happens my faith in my country will be destroyed. It would mean everything I've been taught about freedom is a complete lie.
— realDonaldTrumpFan (@ATrumpPatriot) August 4, 2017
I completely agree and I feel like we are not alone. #Trump1776
— MAGANIFICENT 💠 (@MAGANIFICENT) August 4, 2017
The Democrats are not acting alone Rinos like Mc Cain, Ryan, the Senate leader, Graham, in fact, most GOP are RINOs working in unison
— gatita bonita (@gatita_bonita_s) August 4, 2017
Democrats aren’t the only ones involved in what is increasingly being seen as a coup against Trump. As Faye Higbee wrote on Thursday, Robert Mueller has convened a grand jury in the investigation/witch hunt of conspiracy theories that claim Trump colluded with Russians to win the election.
As Higbee noted, some alleged “Republicans” are actually working to protect Mueller from any action by Trump:
Some lawmakers have even proposed checks to keep Trump from firing Mueller. The problem with that is they may be encroaching on the enumerated Executive powers of the President. Where were they when Obama ran away with the Executive Branch over the top of Congress? They were nowhere to be found.
Senators Lindsey Graham (R) and Cory Booker (D) introduced the Special Counsel Independence Protection Act (SCIPA) in an effort to prevent the President from firing Robert Mueller. It would require a panel of Federal Judges to decide whether the Special Prosecutor should be fired. So they have taken the step around the Executive Branch entirely to hamstring him for any actions at all. That action may not be Constitutional.
Ty Cobb, Special Counsel to the President stated, “We favor anything that brings this investigation to a swift conclusion.” He stated that the President will cooperate fully with Mr. Mueller.
“Which is all fine and dandy as long as the investigation is on the up and up,” she added.
And there’s the problem.
Mueller, for example, has loaded his team with Clinton donors, is going far beyond the charges of Russian meddling, and, Vox said, former FBI Director James Comey and other FBI higher-ups are possible witnesses:
Shortly after the appointment of special counsel Robert Mueller in May, Acting Director of the FBI Andrew McCabe told several of the highest-ranking managers of the bureau they should consider themselves possible witnesses in any investigation into whether President Donald Trump engaged in obstruction of justice, according to two senior federal law enforcement officials.
McCabe has told colleagues that he too is a potential witness in the probe of whether Trump broke the law by trying to thwart the FBI’s Russia investigation and the investigation into whether the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian government to defeat Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.
Two senior federal law enforcement officials have told me that the new revelations illustrate why they believe the potential case against Trump is stronger than outsiders have thought.
“What you are going to have is the potential for a powerful obstruction case,” a senior law enforcement official said. “You are going to have the [former] FBI director testify, and then the acting director, the chief of staff to the FBI director, the FBI’s general counsel, and then others, one right after another. This has never been the word of Trump against what [James Comey] has had to say. This is more like the Federal Bureau of Investigation versus Donald Trump.”
Meanwhile, actual collusion by Hillary Clinton and leaks by so-called “Deep State” Obama holdovers are being ignored.
Since Trump’s election, liberals and Trump-haters of both parties have sought to remove him from office by any means necessary. Woods is right — if they succeed in overturning the election, there will be hell to pay, and it won’t be pretty.
A couple of months ago, Czech President Milos Zeman made an unusual request: He urged citizens to arm themselves against a possible “super-Holocaust” carried out by Muslim terrorists.
Never mind that there are fewer than 4,000 Muslims in this country of 10 million people — gun purchases spiked. One shop owner in East Bohemia, a region in the northern center of the Czech Republic, told a local paper that people were scared of a “wave of Islamists.”
Now the country’s interior ministry is pushing a constitutional change that would let citizens use guns against terrorists. Proponents say this could save lives if an attack occurs and police are delayed or unable to make their way to the scene. To become law, Parliament must approve the proposal; they’ll vote in the coming months.
The Czech Republic already has some of the most lenient gun policies in Europe. It’s home to about 800,000 registered firearms and 300,000 people with gun licenses. Obtaining a weapon is relatively easy: Residents must be 21, pass a gun knowledge check and have no criminal record. By law, Czechs can use their weapons to protect their property or when in danger, although they need to prove they faced a real threat.
This puts the country at odds with much of Europe, which has long supported much more stringent gun-control measures. In the wake of the 2015 terror attacks in Paris, France pushed the European Union to enact even tougher policies. The European Commission’s initial proposal called for a complete ban on the sale of weapons like Kalashnikovs or AR-15s that are intended primarily for military use. Ammunition magazines would be limited to 20 rounds or less.
The Czech Republic came out hard against the directive. Officials warned — somewhat ominously — that the measure would limit the country’s ability to build “an internal security system” and make it nearly impossible to train army reservists. And a total ban on military-style rifles that can fire large numbers of rounds would make illegal thousands of weapons already owned by Czech citizens, potentially creating a black market for terrorists to exploit. Finland and Germany offered their own reservations; Europe’s pro-gun groups also mobilised against the bill with the support of politicians on the extreme right.
After months of contentious negotiations, the EU passed a compromise last month; the Council of Ministers will confirm the measure this spring. All member states will have 15 months to comply with the new gun restrictions. The final measure bans the sale of most military-style rifles and requires all potential buyers to go through a psychological check before they can buy a weapon. If someone fails a check in one E.U. state, that information will be shared in an international database so that the person can’t procure a gun somewhere else. Online sales are also severely curtailed. The Czech Republic was the only country to oppose the directive for being too strict. Luxembourg also voted against the measure, but on the grounds that it was too weak.
That means that regardless of how the Czech parliament votes on the terrorist-hunting measure, gun laws in the Czech Republic are going to get stricter. All gun purchasers will be required to pass the psychological checks, though it’s not yet clear if gun owners will have to turn in newly illegal weapons. That ambiguity has led one Czech newspaper to suggest that the Interior Ministry’s latest move is much more about political safety than safety from terrorism.
Want to see more stories like this? Join the AWM Fans Facebook group today!
The owner of an Arkansas shooting range has banned all Muslim people from patronizing her business. Now, despite threats of legal actions, she is doubling down on her policy.
The businesswoman has now resorted to social media to spread her ideas, and you may find them interesting when you read them.
Last September, Jan Morgan, the owner of Gun Cave Indoor Shooting Range, pronounced that she would no longer allow Muslims from patronizing her business, by declaring it a “Muslim-free zone.”
A legal complaint was filed by The Council for American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR, on behalf of a South Asian father and son who claim they were denied access because of their skin color. Both claim to be Hindu, not Muslim.
She took to Facebook to post photographs of the men, claiming she asked them to leave because they were acting “strange.”
Along with the photographs of the men, she wrote “Geeze…I hate to have to embarrass the liberal mainstream media again, but…a girls gotta do what a girls gotta do.”
She has defended her discriminatory policy by alleging that Islam is a religion that commands its followers to kill unbelievers and that she refuses to put a gun into the hands of “someone who aligns himself with that ideology.”
She goes on to say “We are dealing in lethal firearms. I’m not going to let a Nazi shoot in here, or a Ku Klux Klan member in here, either.”
She says she identifies Muslims based on the names given on reservations. She also claims that, despite the negative attention she has gotten in the press for her policy, her business has actually picked up.
Since her story has become public, many people have taken to social media to share opinions, with some showing their support for her by saying:
“I’d go there just BECAUSE she did it!”- John n Julie Frye
“Good for her. It’s not racist, it’s a religious belief and a way of life.Why the hell should we pander to a religion that discriminates against women.One would think the lefty liberals would be against discrimination.”- Stephan Paul Williams
“Good for her it just shows that you can support what you believe in and not give in to being Politically correct and live with the results.”- Dick Howard
Of course, with this being the internet and all, there were plenty of people expressing their disagreement with the policy, saying things like:
“The Civil Rights Act of 1964 outlawed all discrimination based on race, color, RELIGION, sex, or NATIONAL ORIGIN.”- Sara Hart
“I think it’s wrong. there are some beautiful Muslim names that like Tobias and Ariana for example… those are just two names. imagine going here and getting kicked out because your name is Adam, which is an Islamic or Muslim name.”- Nicole Braden
“If she banned Christians there’d probably be screeches of discrimination.”- Camille
“Her insanely stupid quote that Islam is a religion that commands its followers to kill others proves she knows absolutely nothing about Islam. What an ignorant idiot.”- Michael Brauer
“The Bible commands Christians to kill as well (for a very wide range of offenses, including petty ones). Yet somehow her tiny, bigoted brain is able to recognize that most people ignore those parts of the Bible. What an ignorant piece of human garbage.”- Karrine Knutson
Does she have a leg to stand on or do you think she will lose in court? Share your thoughts with us here.
Oregon Gov. Kate Brown on Wednesday approved Democrat-backed gun control legislation to establish Extreme Risk Protection Orders, forcing subjects to surrender their firearms.
The law, SB 719A, allows police, or a member of a subject’s family or household, to file a petition with the court which could lead to an order prohibiting firearms possession if it is believed they pose an imminent risk to themselves or others. The bill passed the Senate 17-11 in May and the House 31-28 last month, picking up only one Republican supporter along the way.
Brown, a Democrat, signed the bill without comment this week but in remarks to lawmakers during the legislative process she called Extreme Risk Protection Orders the “best way to ensure that a person who is at risk of harming themselves or others is identified, while still ensuring their rights are protected by a court review.”
The new law will establish a process for obtaining an order issued by a judge in a civil court prohibiting the subject from possessing or buying firearms or ammo for one year. It grants police enforcing such orders the power to search for and seize guns that were not surrendered or stored with a third party such as a gun dealer. The subject of the order has 30 days to request a hearing to keep their firearms, which must be held within 21 days.
Those filing fake orders could be imprisoned for up to a year, or pay a fine of up to $6,250, or both.
The law was modeled on one adopted after a ballot referendum last fall in neighboring Washington following a $3.5 million push by gun control groups, which in turn was based on a 2014 California law.
Gun control advocates lauded the new tool to take guns out of some situations.
“SB 719 is a common-sense bill that will empower families and law enforcement officers to take action to potentially prevent tragedies before they happen,” said Lisa Reynolds with Moms Demand Action in a statement. “That law will help save lives.”
Second Amendment groups have blasted the ERPO process, arguing it provides no structure for those deemed at risk to receive help, or those dangerous to be taken into custody. Further, they point to due process concerns.
“By allowing a law enforcement officer, family member, or household member to seek the ERPO, SB 719A would allow people who are not mental health professionals, who may be mistaken, and who may only have minimal contact with the respondent to file a petition with the court and testify on the respondent’s state of mind,” says a statement from the National Rifle Association’s legislative lobby arm.
Ongoing construction this year in Lawrenceville near the location of the historic Allegheny Arsenal has kept Army explosive ordnance disposal teams busy.
Live Civil War-era cannonballs have been popping up since March resulting in a response at first the Pittsburgh Police bomb squad, then a more lingering military presence.
Elements of the 192nd Ordnance Company from Fort Bragg, North Carolina and the 55th Ordnance Company from Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Maryland, transported some 700 items from the construction site to Fort Indiantown Gap, a Pennsylvania National Guard base with a live-fire range and facilities for demolition.
Founded by the U.S. Army Ordnance Department near Lawrenceville in 1814, Allegheny was active through the Civil War period making everything from cartridges to harnesses for artillery horses.
When Dirty Harry announced the .44 Magnum as the most powerful handgun in the world it created huge demand for the big Smith & Wesson revolver. Folks who had no interest in the Model 29 suddenly ran out and bought one and for a long time demand outstripped supply. The .44 Magnum remains a top seller to this day. While folks who live in bear country rightly favor the Magnum for predator defense I rather imagine many .44s are sold to folks who will never encounter a bear in the wild but would like to think they will be prepared. There are also folks who would like to have a .44 for concealed carry and defense but there are few suitable choices.
Charter Arms has made a small .44 Special Bulldog model for many years, and back in the ancient mists of time folks took to cutting down large frame Smith & Wesson and Colt .44s and .45s and making them into belly guns. What’s a belly gun? It’s a powerful revolver, easily concealed, that’s quick to get into action at extreme close ranges, as in, shove it in the bad actor’s belly and stroke the trigger. And while Smith & Wesson has made a couple of large frame, short barreled, lightweight .44 Magnums these blasters are lethal at both ends. Shoot one a few times with full-house .44 Magnum ammunition and you’ll get my meaning.
The idea for a medium frame .44 caliber revolver has been around for a long time. Skeeter Skelton wanted it produced in .44 Special and wrote about it often throughout the 1960s and 70s. I think he would have been pleased when Ruger made their GP-100 revolver in a 5 shot .44 Special but I doubt Skeeter could have imagined that Smith & Wesson would take the concept one step further and make a 5 shot, .44 Magnum in their L-frame sized revolver. I fired this stainless steel revolver, the Model 69 with a 4 inch barrel, at the SHOT show in Las Vegas earlier his year and thought it was a bit brutal when firing .44 Magnum ammunition but might be just the thing when loaded with .44 Special ammo. And then, a couple of months ago, Smith & Wesson released another version of the M69, this one with a short 2.75” barrel – kind of an improved .44 Magnum belly gun.
Being very similar to the K-frame M66 I recently reviewed the M69 is a bit bigger in most dimensions but not nearly as large a the N-Frame Model 29, even those with the abbreviated tubes. That means it’s actually a practical size for concealed carry and could make for an easily packed outdoorsman’s revolver. With the right ammunition the M69 can provide meat for the pot and defend against all manner of two and four legged predators. And that’s one of the very best attributes of the .44 Magnum; the vast selection of ammunition it can fire. Light and heavy bullet loads are available, or can be constructed, in .44 Special or Magnum ammunition to cover any use from plinking and target shooting to hunting and defense.
As with the M66 snubbie, the M69 has a very good synthetic grip that works well in absorbing the energy this revolver is capable of generating. While I was unhappy with the factory trigger on the M66 I’m less so with the one on the M69. Running to 11 pounds, 10 ounces in double action and a slightly creepy 6.5 pounds in single action the trigger is usable but can be improved by a good pistolsmith.
The M69 is equipped with the excellent S&W adjustable sights I’ve used in other revolvers for many years. The rear sight, with a plain, black blade, is adjustable for windage and elevation and the black, ramped front combat sight has the usual red insert. The front sight is pinned to the barrel and is easily replaced if damaged, or should you wish for a different sight, such as a colored fiber optic or gold bead. The barrel is screwed into a shroud and has a minimal barrel/cylinder gap to reduce gas leakage. The five shot cylinder is fluted and there is a crane lock to ensure it locks up tight to promote strength and accuracy. As in all current production S&W revolvers the M69 is equipped with a key lock, a feature S&W traditionalists find to be unnecessary and somewhat offensive.
Perhaps my memory is defective, and maybe the short-barreled revolver has less barrel whip than the 4-inch version I shot earlier, but it seems to me this snubbie is more comfortable to shoot. I fired at least five rounds of every .44 Special and .44 Magnum load I could locate and lived to tell the tale. Even the nastier loads were not that bad. No, I wouldn’t want to shoot the 72 round Border Patrol qualification course with the heavy loads but 5 or 10 rounds was tolerable.
Should you roll your own, this revolver is the right launcher for Skeeter Skelton’s load, a hard cast Keith 429421 semi-wadcutter over 7.5 grains of Unique in a .44 Special case. Skeeter’s favorite load will handle anything you might ask a .44 Special or .44 Magnum to do and will do it without the heavy blast and recoil of the top .44 Magnum loads. I think Skeeter would have been pleased with this revolver. If you’re in the market for an easy packing, powerful defensive revolver for home or trail you should give the S&W M69 a look.
Somali Pirates Mistakenly Attack Naval Vessel and Get What Was Coming
Somali Pirates are not the smartest creatures on Earth and this video shows this perfectly.
These Somali pirates endeavor to swarm and board an obscure boat around evening time. The boat ends up being a US Naval vessel, and they endeavor to escape in the wake of being let go upon. One of the water crafts, loaded with thin marauders, isn’t as fortunate as alternate ones.
In the first place, it’s immobilized, and after that it takes another hit which touches off the fuel. The team bails over the edge to a dim and wet destiny.
A single mother has stopped shopping at supermarkets because she hunts and kills wild animals for her meals.
Lisa Taylor posted photographs which show her holding her rifles and boasting about the animals she has just killed.
The hunter, from Surrey, posed for photographs and smiled in one as she held up a wild boar which had just been shot.
Other images show her sitting next to deer, foxes and roe buck she has just killed while hunting.
Lisa Taylor has uploaded hundreds of photographs of her hunts and was smiling while posing next to dead animals.
Lisa placed her gun next to a dead fox which had just been killed on one of her hunts and uploaded it to her Facebook page.
Ms Taylor then uploaded photographs which showed her cooking venison (pictured) after going on a hunt .
She then cooks the meat and posts photographs of her meals to her Facebook page, which has attracted more than 15,000 followers who ‘like’ her posts.
Ms Taylor wrote on her page: ‘I’m a girl who hunts and cooks. This is my way of meat shopping.’
When uploading photographs of her latest kills, she provides a detailed description of what she has just shot.
On one image, she wrote: ‘This was a Young Roe Buck (Spiker) I shot April 2015. He was quite skinny and was part of the cull plan.
‘Can’t believe Roe Buck season is coming back around so fast. Hopefully after culling last year’s bucks we should have a good healthy and strong herd of Roe deer.’
She also wrote on another picture: ‘A job that has to be done. But after eating my venison and wild boar stew I always need to top my freezer up.’
The mother, who manages a deer park, believes what she does is more humane and ethical than eating animals which have lived on factory farms.
And she keeps her army of followers – including 1,200 people who like her Instagram page – updated with pictures of her £1,200 night vision equipment.
She posed for this photograph and uploaded it online with the caption: ‘Spring is here!!! Who else is looking forward to Roe Buck season?’
Ms Taylor uploaded this photograph and wrote online: ‘Pheasant and duck all prepared’
Other posts uploaded to her Facebook page – which has been liked by 15,000 people – showed her posing for selfies.
But her posts have angered some people who have criticised her decision to kill wild animals and one person called her a ‘disgusting person’.
Other critics asked her to ‘leave the poor foxes alone’ after she uploaded photographs to her Facebook page.
Padraig Hannafin wrote: ‘Why celebrate this? I’m from a sheep farming family so I get why it’s done but I don’t get the pride or glee of killing an animal.’
But other people posted positive comments to support her.
Greg Mayhew replied to one of her posts and said: ‘That’s great news !! Well done and much deserved. Keep posting for us. Cheers.’
Ian Jamieson added: ‘Well done Lisa all because of your hard work, you should be very proud of yourself xxx.’
Elisa Allen, Director animal rights charity PETA UK, told MailOnline: ‘There’s a word for a person who derives pleasure from killing.
‘And while this woman is clearly desperate for attention, callously snuffing out the lives of animals who wanted nothing more than a peaceful existence will make her reviled rather than revered.
‘Most Brits admire real sportspeople and genuine sportsmanship, not small individuals who hurt others in order to make themselves feel big.’